Our AI Strategy for Litigation
AI-Powered
Human-Centric
Litigation
Where transactions build value with counterparties who want to deal, enforcement builds it with those who do not. Its value turns not on goodwill or registration, but on the strength of the evidence and the credibility of the threat behind it. And because an enforcement record is no more troubled by the AI authorship and inventorship questions that constrain us elsewhere than a negotiated agreement is, this is where — as in Transactions — we deploy AI aggressively.
This is the half of the practice for those who refuse to play nice. We do not try cases; we build the evidence and apply the pressure that brings the unwilling to the table — and once they arrive, our Transactions practice papers the deal.
We use AI to accelerate research, reduce costs, and improve efficiency across every stage of a dispute — from detection through resolution. AI helps us monitor for infringement, build the evidentiary record, apply graduated pressure, and convert claims into revenue. But it never replaces human judgment.
Every strategic decision, opinion, and enforcement action is written, reviewed, and signed by a registered attorney with 10,000+ hours of experience.
For detection, we utilize AI-powered tools to (i) monitor competitor filings, product launches, imports, and marketplaces for infringement in your technology space; (ii) map the universe of potential infringers and rank them by exposure, intentionality, and collectibility; and (iii) size the opportunity — and the risk to your own rights — before you ever make a move.
For case-building, we utilize AI-powered tools to (i) analyze infringement claim-by-claim and pressure-test your own rights against a validity challenge; (ii) preserve evidence with a chain of custody that survives scrutiny and model damages so the number is defensible; and (iii) assemble the case file — the instrument that carries an enforcement claim the way a contract carries a deal — with human experts leading and our private LLM following.
For pressure, we utilize AI-powered tools to (i) draft cease-and-desist demands backed by the analysis that makes them credible; (ii) coordinate graduated escalation — marketplace takedowns, ITC Section 337 investigations, and counsel across jurisdictions — calibrated to move the target rather than merely threaten it; and (iii) quarterback the campaign across forums and timelines so pressure is strategic, not just aggressive.
For monetization, we utilize AI-powered tools to (i) convert caught infringers into paying licensees on terms the evidence supports; (ii) benchmark royalties and settlement values against comparable transactions and verdicts; (iii) prepare you for negotiations with market data and competitive intelligence; and (iv) assemble a case file built for contingency and pitch it to experienced litigators — because a proven infringement case is the most powerful licensing conversation starter there is.
Once the unwilling are at the table, the fight becomes a deal — and our Transactions practice papers and closes it. Enforcement opens the door; Transactions walks through it.
We understand that a right you cannot or will not enforce is a right in name only. Our best advice is to monitor aggressively, build the file before you need it, and negotiate from a position of proven strength — because the case you build today is the license you collect tomorrow.
Let’s Get Started
From early-stage discoveries to commercial success, we help innovators protect, develop, and maximize the value of their intellectual property.